% This data is distributed under the terms of the Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0 - See more at: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1-0/
    @Article{OJIS_2015v2i2n04_Ikegami,
        title     = {Model of Creative Thinking Process on Analysis of Handwriting by Digital Pen},
        author    = {Kenshin Ikegami and
                     Yukio Ohsawa},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {2},
        pages     = {27--39},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194781},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194781},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {In order to perceive infrequent events as hints for new ideas, it is desired to know and model the process of creating and refining ideas. In this paper, we address this modeling problem experimentally. Firstly, we focus on the relation between thinking time and writing time in handwriting. We observe two types of patterns; one group takes longer time in thinking and shorter in writing, the other takes longer in writing and shorter in thinking. The group having spends longer in writing has shorter time span from one sentence to another than the other group. Backtracking, i.e., the event that  participants return back to their former sheet and modify opinions, is observed more often in the group of longer writing than the other group. In addition, participants in this backtracking group gets higher scores for their ideas on sheets than those in the no-backtracking group. We propose a model of creative thinking by applying Operations of Structure of Intellect. It is inferred that the group of longer writing conducts a series of thinking flow, including divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation. In contrast, the group of longer thinking tends to conduct the two different thinking flow: divergent thinking and evaluation; convergent thinking and evaluation. For making creative ideas, we conduct divergent thinking without evaluation and created a large number of ideas. We conclude that the rotations of divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation increase the frequency of "backtracking" and make the ideas more logical ones.}
    }