RonPub

Loading...

RonPub Banner

RonPub -- Research Online Publishing

RonPub (Research online Publishing) is an academic publisher of online, open access, peer-reviewed journals.  RonPub aims to provide a platform for researchers, developers, educators, and technical managers to share and exchange their research results worldwide.

RonPub Is Open Access:

RonPub publishes all of its journals under the open access model, defined under BudapestBerlin, and Bethesda open access declarations:

  • All articles published by RonPub is fully open access and online available to readers free of charge.  
  • All open access articles are distributed under  Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction free of charge in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. 
  • Authors retain all copyright to their work.
  • Authors may also publish the publisher's version of their paper on any repository or website. 

RonPub Is Cost-Effective:

To be able to provide open access journals, RonPub defray publishing cost by charging a one-time publication fee for each accepted article. One of RonPub objectives is providing a fast and high-quality but lower-cost publishing service. In order to ensure that the fee is never a barrier to publication, RonPub offers a fee waiver for authors who do not have funds to cover publication fees. We also offer a partial fee waiver for editors and reviewers of RonPub as as reward for their work. See the respective Journal webpage for the concrete publication fee.

RonPub Publication Criteria

What we are most concerned about is the quality, not quantity, of publications. We only publish high-quality scholarly papers. Publication Criteria describes the criteria that should be met for a contribution to be acceptable for publication in RonPub journals.

RonPub Publication Ethics Statement:

In order to ensure the publishing quality and the reputation of the publisher, it is important that all parties involved in the act of publishing adhere to the standards of the publishing ethical behaviour. To verify the originality of submissions, we use Plagiarism Detection Tools, like Anti-Plagiarism, PaperRater, Viper, to check the content of manuscripts submitted to our journals against existing publications.

RonPub follows the Code of Conduct of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and deals with the cases of misconduct according to the COPE Flowcharts

Long-Term Preservation in the German National Library

Our publications are archived and permanently-preserved in the German National Library. The publications, which are archived in the German National Library, are not only long-term preserved but also accessible in the future, because the German National Library ensures that digital data saved in the old formats can be viewed and used on current computer systems in the same way they were on the original systems which are long obsolete.

Where is RonPub?

RonPub is a registered corporation in Lübeck, Germany. Lübeck is a beautiful coastal city, owing wonderful sea resorts and sandy beaches as well as good restaurants. It is located in northern Germany and is 60 kilometer away from Hamburg.

OJIS Cover
Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)
OJIS, an open access and peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original and creative research results on information technologies. OJIS distributes its articles under the open access model. All articles of OJIS are fully open access and online available to readers free of charge. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Accepted manuscripts are published online immediately.
Publisher: RonPub UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Lübeck, Germany
Contact: OJIS Editorial Office
ISSN: 2198-9281
Call for Papers: txtUTF-8 txtASCII pdf
OJIS Cover
Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)
OJIS, an open access and peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original and creative research results on information technologies. OJIS distributes its articles under the open access model. All articles of OJIS are fully open access and online available to readers free of charge. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Accepted manuscripts are published online immediately.
Publisher: RonPub UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Lübeck, Germany
Contact: OJIS Editorial Office
ISSN: 2198-9281
Call for Papers: txtUTF-8 txtASCII pdf

Aims & Scope

OJIS aims to provide a forum for sharing and exchanging ideas, experiences and research results among scientists and practitioners of information technologies. We publish regular research papers, short communications, reviews and visionary papers in all aspects of information systems. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. 

Regular research papers are full original findings with adequate experimental research. They make substantial theoretical and empirical contributions to the research field.  Research papers should be written in as concise a style as possible.

Short communications reports novel research ideas. The work represented should be technically sound and significantly advancing the state of the art. Short communications also include exploratory studies and methodological articles.

Research reviews are insightful and accessible overview of a certain field of research. They conceptualize research issues, synthesize existing findings and advance the understanding of the field. They may also suggest new research issues and directions.

Visionary papers identify new research issues and future research directions, and describe new research visions in the field. The new visions will potentially have great impact for the future society and daily life. 

The journal expects original, high-quality papers, including but not limited to the fields:

  • Data management
  • Information management
  • Knowledge management 
  • Knowledge Representation 
  • Information integration
  • Intelligent information access 
  • Enterprise Application Integration
  • E-commerce
  • Privacy and security in an e-society 
  • Design, Development and Management of information systems

Author Guidelines

Publication Criteria

Publication Criteria provides important information for authors to prepare their manuscripts with a high possibility of being accepted.

Manuscript Preparation

Please prepare your manuscripts using the manuscript template of the journal. It is available for download as word doc docx and latex version zip. The template describes the format and structure of manuscripts and other necessary information for preparing manuscripts. Manuscripts should be written in English. There is no restriction on the length of manuscripts.

Submission

Authors submit their manuscripts following the information on the submit pageAuthors first submit their manuscripts in PDF format. Once a manuscript is accepted, the author then submits the revised manuscript as a PDF file and a word file or latex folder (with all the material necessary to generate the PDF file). The work described in the submitted manuscript must be previously unpublished; it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. 

Authors are welcome to suggest qualified reviewers for their papers, but this is not mandatory. If the author wants to do so, please provide the name, affiliations and e-mail addresses for all suggested reviewers.

Manuscript Status

After submission of manuscripts, authors will receive an email to confirm receipt of manuscripts. Subsequent enquiries concerning paper progress should be sent to the email address of the journal.

Review Procedure

OJIS is committed to enforcing a rigorous peer-review process. All manuscripts submitted for publication in OJIS are strictly and thoroughly peer-reviewed. When a manuscript is submitted, the editor-in-chief assigns it to an appropriate editor who will be in charge of the review process of the manuscript. The editor first suggests potential reviewers and then organizes the peer-reviewing herself/himself or entrusts it to the editor office. For each manuscript, typically three review reports will be collected. The editor and the editor-in-chief evaluate the manuscript itself and the review reports and make an accept/revision/reject decision. Authors will be informed with the decision and reviewing results within 6-8 weeks on average after the manuscript submission. In the case of revision, authors are required to perform an adequate revision to address the concerns from evaluation reports. A second round of peer-review will be performed if necessary.

Accepted manuscripts are published online immediately.

Copyrights

Authors publishing with RonPub open journals retain the copyright to their work. 

All articles published by RonPub is fully open access and online available to readers free of charge.  RonPub publishes all open access articles under the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction freely, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Digital Archiving Policy

Our publications have been archived and permanently-preserved in the German National Library. The publications, which are archived in the German National Library, are not only long-term preserved but also accessible in the future, because the German National Library ensures that digital data saved in the old formats can be viewed and used on current computer systems in the same way they were on the original systems which are long obsolete. Further measures will be taken if necessary. Furthermore, we also encourage our authors to self-archive their articles published on the website of RonPub.

Publication Ethics Statement

In order to ensure the publishing quality and the reputation of the journal, it is important that all parties involved in the act of publishing adhere to the standards of the publishing ethical behaviour. To verify the originality of submissions, we use Plagiarism Detection Tools, like Anti-Plagiarism, PaperRater, Viper, to check the content of manuscripts submitted to our journals against existing publications.

Our journal follows the Code of Conduct of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and deals with the cases of misconduct according to the COPE Flowcharts

Editor-in-Chief

S.M. Aqil Burney, Institute of Business Management, Pakistan

Editors

Giuliano Armano, University of Cagliari, Italy

Mihaela Cocea, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau, CEDRIC-CNAM and ESSEC Business School, France

Ernesto Exposito, Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, E2S UPPA, France

Joaquim Filipe, School of Technology of Setúbal, Portugal

Anna Formica, National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Systems and Information Analysis 'Antonio Ruberti', Italy

William Grosky, University of Michigan-Dearborn, USA

Ivan I. Ivanov, Empire State College, USA

Sokratis K. Katsikas, University of Piraeus, Greece

Carsten Kleiner, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hanover, Germany

Petr Křemen, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic

Yuhua Li, University of Ulster, UK

Chuan-Ming Liu, National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan

Pericles Loucopoulos, University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Stephane Maag, Telecom SudParis, France

George D. Magoulas, Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom

Massimo Marchiori, University of Padua, Italy, and Chief Technology Officer, Atomium Culture

Alok Mishra, Atilim University, Ankara - Turkey

Harekrishna Misra, Institute of Rural Management Anand, India

Stavros D. Nikolopoulos, University of Ioannina, Greece

Eric Pardede, La Trobe University, Australia

Cathryn Peoples, The Open University, UK and Ulster University, UK

Giovanni Sacco, Universita' di Torino, Italy

Vittorio Scarano, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italy

Yair Wiseman, Bar-Ilan University, Israel

Kokou Yetongnon, Université de Bourgogne, France

Sherali Zeadally, University of Kentucky, USA

Designing the Market of Data - for Practical Data Sharing via Educational and Innovative Communications (MoDAT-2015)

This special issue will contain extended versions of the papers selected from Designing the Market of Data - for Practical Data Sharing via Educational and Innovative Communications (MoDAT-2014).
ABOUT:

In the market of data, where data are reasonably dealt with -- sold, opened, or shared based on negotiation. Since last year, we have been aiming at realizing a social environment where each person on earth feels free to share one’s own and others’ data, with learning latent values of data, without fearing the loss of business opportunities. Since 2013, we have been observing effects of communication in experimental markets of data. Among other effects, humans’ thoughts for and by sharing/combining data turned out to be innovative in that born ideas tend to lead to novel and productive proposals in real businesses. Also, the effect was educative in that participants tend to learn methods and techniques for analyzing latent dynamics behind data. Reflecting such observations, here we call for contributions about to understand and design the market of data as an environment for educational and innovative communications. Furthermore, in the market of data, a data scientist is expected to learn techniques for data mining from others who have been working on data from different domains. Analogies based on similarities between data are expected to accelerate such learning, and such the analogy may be aided by visualized correlations among features of data and among success/failure cases of analyses.

For this special issue we call for scientific/technical/philosophical papers about what we can/should do for creating a mark etplace where data and analysts’ knowledge are shared by selling and buying, with reasonably determining the conditions for sharing. Or, people in the market may communicate to decide to expose the data as open-source, if the trust of the data provider is expected to be elevated highly due to the contribution to people in the public. Thus the Market of Data means a place where the value of data and knowledge can be externalized.

SCOPE:

The special issue expects original, high-quality papers, including but NOT limited to the following topics:

  • Data/Text mining and visualization:
    Methods for visualizing links among data, representing their similarities and the possibility to combine them. Mining data/text for finding essential attributes and for extracting noteworthy causalities among events in data is also included in this topic.
  • Communication, education, and innovation:
    Communication of stakeholders, which may externalize the use scenarios of and the latent value of data, is an important topic here. This effect may be reinforced by the visualization mentioned above, and even trigger the creation of products/services and the learning of the potential impact of data on the decision of people.
  • Knowledge representation:
    It is desired to construct ontologies of variables in data, for reasonably linking among heterogeneous data. Hierarchical structures of relevance among events, concepts, and variables, should be also considered and discussed here, since it will support the thoughts of analysts and users of users.

We also love to involve ones beyond the community of data mining --- e.g., educators, business administrators, stock dealers, sociologists, cognitive scientists.

Guest Editors

  • Prof. Yukio Ohsawa, The University of Tokyo, Japan
  • Prof. Akinori Abe, Chiba University, Japan

Important Dates

  • Submission Deadline: 28-09-2015
  • Author Notification: 30-11-2015
Articles (total number of downloads: 27148, total number of citations: 16)tex xml rdf rss

 Open Access 

Designing the Market of Data - For Practical Data Sharing via Educational and Innovative Communications

Yukio Ohsawa, Akinori Abe

Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS), 2(2), Pages 1-3, 2015, Downloads: 4222

Full-Text: pdf | URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194720 | GNL-LP: 1132361001 | Meta-Data: tex xml rdf rss | Show/Hide Abstract | Show/Hide BibTex

Abstract: This special issue of Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS) reports work on designing the market of data for practical data sharing via educational and innovative communications (MoDAT). In the market of data, data are reasonably dealt with sold, opened, or shared based on negotiation. Since last years, we have been aiming at realizing a social environment, where each person feels free to share one's own and others' data for learning the latent value of data without fearing the loss of business opportunities. In the market, data and analysts' knowledge are shared by selling and buying, with reasonably determining the conditions for sharing. People in the market may communicate with each other in order to decide to expose the data as open-source, if the trust of the data provider is expected to be elevated highly due to the contribution to people in the public. Thus the Market of Data means a place where the value of data and knowledge can be externalized. OJIS is published by RonPub (www.ronpub.com), which is an academic publisher of online, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

BibTex:

    @Article{OJIS_2015v1i2n01p_Ohsawa,
        title     = {Designing the Market of Data - For Practical Data Sharing via Educational and Innovative Communications},
        author    = {Yukio Ohsawa and
                     Akinori Abe},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {2},
        pages     = {1--3},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194720},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194720},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {This special issue of Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS) reports work on designing the market of data for practical data sharing via educational and innovative communications (MoDAT). In the market of data, data are reasonably dealt with sold, opened, or shared based on negotiation. Since last years, we have been aiming at realizing a social environment, where each person feels free to share one's own and others' data for learning the latent value of data without fearing the loss of business opportunities. In the market, data and analysts' knowledge are shared by selling and buying, with reasonably determining the conditions for sharing. People in the market may communicate with each other in order to decide to expose the data as open-source, if the trust of the data provider is expected to be elevated highly due to the contribution to people in the public. Thus the Market of Data means a place where the value of data and knowledge can be externalized. OJIS is published by RonPub (www.ronpub.com), which is an academic publisher of online, open access, peer-reviewed journals.}
    }

 Open Access 

Relationship between Externalized Knowledge and Evaluation in the Process of Creating Strategic Scenarios

Teruaki Hayashi, Yukio Ohsawa

Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS), 2(1), Pages 29-40, 2015, Downloads: 5886, Citations: 10

Full-Text: pdf | URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194751 | GNL-LP: 1132361079 | Meta-Data: tex xml rdf rss | Show/Hide Abstract | Show/Hide BibTex

Abstract: Social systems are changing so rapidly that it is important for humans to make decisions considering uncertainty. A scenario is information about the series of events/actions, which supports decision makers to take actions and reduce risks. We propose Action Planning for refining simple ideas into practical scenarios (strategic scenarios). Frameworks and items on Action Planning Sheets provide participants with organized constraints, to lead to creative and logical thinking for solving real issues in businesses or daily life. Communication among participants who have preset roles leads the externalization of knowledge. In this study, we set three criteria for evaluating strategic scenarios; novelty, utility, and feasibility, and examine the relationship between externalized knowledge and the evaluation values, in order to consider factors which affect the evaluations. Regarding a word contained in roles and scenarios as the smallest unit of knowledge, we calculate Relativeness between roles and scenarios. The results of our experiment suggest that the lower the relativeness of a strategic scenario, the higher the strategic scenario is evaluated in novelty. In addition, in the evaluation of utility, a scenario satisfying a covert requirement tends to be estimated higher. Moreover, we found the externalization of stakeholders may affect the realization of strategic scenarios.

BibTex:

    @Article{OJIS_2015v2i1n03_Hayashi,
        title     = {Relationship between Externalized Knowledge and Evaluation in the Process of Creating Strategic Scenarios},
        author    = {Teruaki Hayashi and
                     Yukio Ohsawa},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {1},
        pages     = {29--40},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194751},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194751},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {Social systems are changing so rapidly that it is important for humans to make decisions considering uncertainty. A scenario is information about the series of events/actions, which supports decision makers to take actions and reduce risks. We propose Action Planning for refining simple ideas into practical scenarios (strategic scenarios). Frameworks and items on Action Planning Sheets provide participants with organized constraints, to lead to creative and logical thinking for solving real issues in businesses or daily life. Communication among participants who have preset roles leads the externalization of knowledge. In this study, we set three criteria for evaluating strategic scenarios; novelty, utility, and feasibility, and examine the relationship between externalized knowledge and the evaluation values, in order to consider factors which affect the evaluations. Regarding a word contained in roles and scenarios as the smallest unit of knowledge, we calculate Relativeness between roles and scenarios. The results of our experiment suggest that the lower the relativeness of a strategic scenario, the higher the strategic scenario is evaluated in novelty. In addition, in the evaluation of utility, a scenario satisfying a covert requirement tends to be estimated higher. Moreover, we found the externalization of stakeholders may affect the realization of strategic scenarios.}
    }

 Open Access 

Concept Design for Creating Essential Hypothesis, Rules, and Goals: Toward a Data Marketplace

Jun Nakamura, Masahiko Teramoto

Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS), 2(2), Pages 16-26, 2015, Downloads: 6429, Citations: 4

Full-Text: pdf | URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194774 | GNL-LP: 1132361117 | Meta-Data: tex xml rdf rss | Show/Hide Abstract | Show/Hide BibTex

Abstract: The abductive reasoning model has been discussed in the context of business strategy. However, this model seems unrealistic for applications in the real business world considering the unpredictable, competitive business environment. This study improves the model by formulating an experimental case study through a web-based workplace for generating product ideas. We discuss the possible embodiment of product ideas as the basis for configuring features through the use of dynamic quality function deployment. The entire concept design process is proposed as a blueprint for building a data marketplace.

BibTex:

    @Article{OJIS_2015v2i2n03_Nakamura,
        title     = {Concept Design for Creating Essential Hypothesis, Rules, and Goals: Toward a Data Marketplace},
        author    = {Jun Nakamura and
                     Masahiko Teramoto},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {2},
        pages     = {16--26},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194774},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194774},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {The abductive reasoning model has been discussed in the context of business strategy. However, this model seems unrealistic for applications in the real business world considering the unpredictable, competitive business environment. This study improves the model by formulating an experimental case study through a web-based workplace for generating product ideas. We discuss the possible embodiment of product ideas as the basis for configuring features through the use of dynamic quality function deployment. The entire concept design process is proposed as a blueprint for building a data marketplace.}
    }

 Open Access 

Model of Creative Thinking Process on Analysis of Handwriting by Digital Pen

Kenshin Ikegami, Yukio Ohsawa

Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS), 2(2), Pages 27-39, 2015, Downloads: 5390, Citations: 1

Full-Text: pdf | URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194781 | GNL-LP: 1132361125 | Meta-Data: tex xml rdf rss | Show/Hide Abstract | Show/Hide BibTex

Abstract: In order to perceive infrequent events as hints for new ideas, it is desired to know and model the process of creating and refining ideas. In this paper, we address this modeling problem experimentally. Firstly, we focus on the relation between thinking time and writing time in handwriting. We observe two types of patterns; one group takes longer time in thinking and shorter in writing, the other takes longer in writing and shorter in thinking. The group having spends longer in writing has shorter time span from one sentence to another than the other group. Backtracking, i.e., the event that participants return back to their former sheet and modify opinions, is observed more often in the group of longer writing than the other group. In addition, participants in this backtracking group gets higher scores for their ideas on sheets than those in the no-backtracking group. We propose a model of creative thinking by applying Operations of Structure of Intellect. It is inferred that the group of longer writing conducts a series of thinking flow, including divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation. In contrast, the group of longer thinking tends to conduct the two different thinking flow: divergent thinking and evaluation; convergent thinking and evaluation. For making creative ideas, we conduct divergent thinking without evaluation and created a large number of ideas. We conclude that the rotations of divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation increase the frequency of "backtracking" and make the ideas more logical ones.

BibTex:

    @Article{OJIS_2015v2i2n04_Ikegami,
        title     = {Model of Creative Thinking Process on Analysis of Handwriting by Digital Pen},
        author    = {Kenshin Ikegami and
                     Yukio Ohsawa},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {2},
        pages     = {27--39},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194781},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194781},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {In order to perceive infrequent events as hints for new ideas, it is desired to know and model the process of creating and refining ideas. In this paper, we address this modeling problem experimentally. Firstly, we focus on the relation between thinking time and writing time in handwriting. We observe two types of patterns; one group takes longer time in thinking and shorter in writing, the other takes longer in writing and shorter in thinking. The group having spends longer in writing has shorter time span from one sentence to another than the other group. Backtracking, i.e., the event that  participants return back to their former sheet and modify opinions, is observed more often in the group of longer writing than the other group. In addition, participants in this backtracking group gets higher scores for their ideas on sheets than those in the no-backtracking group. We propose a model of creative thinking by applying Operations of Structure of Intellect. It is inferred that the group of longer writing conducts a series of thinking flow, including divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation. In contrast, the group of longer thinking tends to conduct the two different thinking flow: divergent thinking and evaluation; convergent thinking and evaluation. For making creative ideas, we conduct divergent thinking without evaluation and created a large number of ideas. We conclude that the rotations of divergent thinking, convergent thinking and evaluation increase the frequency of "backtracking" and make the ideas more logical ones.}
    }

 Open Access 

A Toulmin's Framework-Based Method for Design Argumentation of Cyber-Physical Systems

Noriyuki Kushiro, Ryoichi Torikai, Shodai Matsuda, Kunio Takahara

Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS), 2(2), Pages 40-55, 2015, Downloads: 5221, Citations: 1

Full-Text: pdf | URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194809 | GNL-LP: 1132361141 | Meta-Data: tex xml rdf rss | Show/Hide Abstract | Show/Hide BibTex

Abstract: The design of cyber-physical systems (CPS) is a promising domain, where the data market is expected to soon penetrate. When engineers focus on only a particular part of data (whether intentionally or not) for establishing a design hypothesis, the design hypothesis may also be supported by data sets in the market. Therefore, the validity of such a design hypothesis cannot be evaluated by the data itself, and can only be accepted by the robustness of the logic behind the design argumentation. Although the validation of the design logic is significant, cognitive aspects (which people have spontaneously) disturb the design argumentation reasoning. Therefore, a design method that overcomes the cognitive aspects is indispensable for the CPS designers. This work proposes a CPS design method using the interaction between logic and data sets with a logic visualization tool, and applies the proposed method to the design of a diagnosis system for semiconductor manufacture. The capability of the proposed method is also discussed and analyzed in this paper.

BibTex:

    @Article{OJIS_2015v2i2n05_Kushiro,
        title     = {A Toulmin's Framework-Based Method for Design Argumentation of Cyber-Physical Systems},
        author    = {Noriyuki Kushiro and
                     Ryoichi Torikai and
                     Shodai Matsuda and
                     Kunio Takahara},
        journal   = {Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)},
        issn      = {2198-9281},
        year      = {2015},
        volume    = {2},
        number    = {2},
        pages     = {40--55},
        url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194809},
        urn       = {urn:nbn:de:101:1-201705194809},
        publisher = {RonPub},
        bibsource = {RonPub},
        abstract = {The design of cyber-physical systems (CPS) is a promising domain, where the data market is expected to soon penetrate. When engineers focus on only a particular part of data (whether intentionally or not) for establishing a design hypothesis, the design hypothesis may also be supported by data sets in the market. Therefore, the validity of such a design hypothesis cannot be evaluated by the data itself, and can only be accepted by the robustness of the logic behind the design argumentation. Although the validation of the design logic is significant, cognitive aspects (which people have spontaneously) disturb the design argumentation reasoning. Therefore, a design method that overcomes the cognitive aspects is indispensable for the CPS designers. This work proposes a CPS design method using the interaction between logic and data sets with a logic visualization tool, and applies the proposed method to the design of a diagnosis system for semiconductor manufacture. The capability of the proposed method is also discussed and analyzed in this paper.}
    }

OJIS Publication Fees

All articles published by RonPub are fully open access and online available to readers free of charge. To be able to provide open access journals, RonPub defrays the costs (induced by processing and editing of manuscripts, provision and maintenance of infrastructure, and routine operation and management of journals) by charging an one-time publication fee for each accepted article. In order to ensure that the fee is never a barrier to publication, RonPub offers a fee waiver for authors from low-income countries. Authors who do not have funds to cover publication fees should submit an application during the submission process. Applications of waiver will be examined on a case by case basis. The scientific committee members of RonPub are entitled a partial waiver of the standard publication fees as reward for their work. 

  • Standard publication fee: 338 Euro (excluding tax).
  • Authors from the low-income countries: 71% waiver of the standard publication fee. (Note: The list is subject to change based on the data of the World Bank Group.):
    Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo (Democratic Republic), Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea (Democratic People’s Republic), Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao (People’s Democratic Republic), Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Moldova, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, São Tomé and Principe, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Timor-Leste, Togo, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, West Bank and Gaza Strip, Yemen (Republic), Zambia, Zimbabwe
  • Scientific committee members: 25% waiver of the standard publication fee.
  • Guest editors and reviewers: 25% waiver of the standard publication fee for one year.

Payments are subject to tax. A German VAT (value-added tax) at 19% will be charged if applicable. US and Canadian customers need to provide their sales tax number and their certificate of incorporation to be exempt from the VAT charge; European Union customers (not German customers) need to provide their VAT to be exempt from the VAT charge. Customers from Germany and other countries will be charged with the VAT charge. Individuals are not eligible for tax exempt status.

Editors and reviewers have no access to payment information. The inability to pay will not influence the decision to publish a paper; decisions to publish are only based on the quality of work and the editorial criteria.

OJIS Indexing

In order for our publications getting widely abstracted, indexed and cited, the following methods are employed:

  • Various meta tags are embedded in each publication webpage, including Google Scholar Tags, Dublic Core, EPrints, BE Press and Prism. This enables crawlers of e.g. Google Scholar to discover and index our publications.
  • Different metadata export formats are provided for each article, including BibTex, XML, RSS and RDF. This makes readers to cite our papers easily.
  • An OAI-PMH interface is implemented, which facilitates our article metadata harvesting by indexing services and databases.

The paper Getting Indexed by Bibliographic Databases in the Area of Computer Science provides a comprehensive survey on indexing formats, techniques and databases. We will also continue our efforts on dissemination and indexing of our publications.

OJIS has been indexed by the following libraries and bibliographic databases:

Submission to Open Journal of Information Systems (OJIS)

Please submit your manuscript by carefully filling in the information in the following web form. If there technical problems, you may also submit your manuscript by sending the information and the manuscript to .

Submission to Regular or Special Issue

Please specify if the paper is submitted to a regular issue or one of the special issues:

Type of Paper

Please specify the type of your paper here. Please check Aims & Scope if you are not sure of which type your paper is.





Title

Please specify the title of your paper here:

Abstract

Please copy & paste the abstract of your paper here:

Authors

Please provide necessary information about the authors of your submission here. Please mark the contact authors, which will be contacted for the main correspondence.

Author 1:


Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Author 2:


Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Author 3:


Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Add Author

Conflicts of Interest

Please specify any conflicts of interests here. Conflicts of interest occur e.g. if the author and the editor are colleagues, work or worked closely together, or are relatives.

Suggestion of Editors (Optional)

You can suggest editors (with scientific background of the topics addressed in your submission) for handling your submission. The Editor-in-Chief may consider your suggestion, but may also choose another editor.

Suggestion of Reviewers (Optional)

You can suggest reviewers (with scientific background of the topics addressed in your submission) for handling your submission. The editor of your submission may consider your suggestion, but may also choose other or additional reviewers in order to guarantee an independent review process.

Reviewer 1:

Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Reviewer 2:

Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Reviewer 3:

Name:
EMail:
Affiliation:
Webpage (optional):

Add Reviewer

Paper upload

Please choose your manuscript file for uploading. It should be a pdf file. Please take care that your manuscript is formatted according to the templates provided by RonPub, which are available at our Author Guidelines page. Manuscripts not formatted according to our RonPub templates will be rejected without review!

If you wish that the reviewer are not aware of your name, please submit a blinded manuscript leaving out identifiable information like authors' names and affiliations.

Choose PDF file...

Chosen PDF file: none

Captcha

Please fill in the characters of the image into the text field under the image.

Captcha

Submission

For Authors

Manuscript Preparation

Authors should first read the author guidelines of the corresponding journal. Manuscripts must be prepared using the manuscript template of the respective journal. It is available as word and latex version for download at the Author Guidelines of the corresponding journal page. The template describes the format and structure of manuscripts and other necessary information for preparing manuscripts. Manuscripts should be written in English. There is no restriction on the length of manuscripts.

Submission

Authors submit their manuscripts via the submit page of the corresponding journal. Authors first submit their manuscripts in PDF format. Once a manuscript is accepted, the author then submits the revised manuscript as PDF file and word file or latex folder (with all the material necessary to generate the PDF file). The work described in the submitted manuscript must be previously unpublished; it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. 

Authors are welcome to suggest qualified reviewers for their papers, but this is not mandatory. If the author wants to do so, please provide the name, affiliations and e-mail addresses for all suggested reviewers.

Manuscript Status

After submission of manuscripts, authors will receive an email to confirm receipt of manuscripts within a few days. Subsequent enquiries concerning paper progress should be made to the corresponding editorial office (see individual journal webpage for concrete contact information).

Review Procedure

RonPub is committed to enforcing a rigorous peer-review process. All manuscripts submitted for publication in RonPub journals are strictly and thoroughly peer-reviewed. When a manuscript is submitted to a RonPub journal, the editor-in-chief of the journal assigns it to an appropriate editor who will be in charge of the review process of the manuscript. The editor first suggests potential reviewers and then organizes the peer-reviewing herself/himself or entrusts it to the editor office. For each manuscript, typically three review reports will be collected. The editor and the editor-in-chief evaluate the manuscript itself and the review reports and make an accept/revision/reject decision. Authors will be informed with the decision and reviewing results within 6-8 weeks on average after the manuscript submission. In the case of revision, authors are required to perform an adequate revision to address the concerns from evaluation reports. A new round of peer-review will be performed if necessary.

Accepted manuscripts are published online immediately.

Copyrights

Authors publishing with RonPub open journals retain the copyright to their work. 

All articles published by RonPub is fully open access and online available to readers free of charge.  RonPub publishes all open access articles under the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction freely, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Digital Archiving Policy

Our publications have been archived and permanently-preserved in the German National Library. The publications, which are archived in the German National Library, are not only long-term preserved but also accessible in the future, because the German National Library ensures that digital data saved in the old formats can be viewed and used on current computer systems in the same way they were on the original systems which are long obsolete. Further measures will be taken if necessary. Furthermore, we also encourage our authors to self-archive their articles published on the website of RonPub.

For Editors

About RonPub

RonPub is academic publisher of online, open access, peer-reviewed journals. All articles published by RonPub is fully open access and online available to readers free of charge.

RonPub is located in Lübeck, Germany. Lübeck is a beautiful harbour city, 60 kilometer away from Hamburg.

Editor-in-Chief Responsibilities

The Editor-in-Chief of each journal is mainly responsible for the scientific quality of the journal and for assisting in the management of the journal. The Editor-in-Chief suggests topics for the journal, invites distinguished scientists to join the editorial board, oversees the editorial process, and makes the final decision whether a paper can be published after peer-review and revisions.

As a reward for the work of a Editor-in-Chief, the Editor-in-Chief will obtain a 25% discount of the standard publication fee for her/his papers (the Editor-in-Chief is one of authors) published in any of RonPub journals.

Editors’ Responsibilities

Editors assist the Editor-in-Chief in the scientific quality and in decision about topics of the journal. Editors are also encouraged to help to promote the journal among their peers and at conferences. An editor invites at least three reviewers to review a manuscript, but may also review him-/herself the manuscript. After carefully evaluating the review reports and the manuscript itself, the editor makes a commendation about the status of the manuscript. The editor's evaluation as well as the review reports are then sent to EiC, who make the final decision whether a paper can be published after peer-review and revisions. 

The communication with Editorial Board members is done primarily by E-mail, and the Editors are expected to respond within a few working days on any question sent by the Editorial Office so that manuscripts can be processed in a timely fashion. If an editor does not respond or cannot process the work in time, and under some special situations, the editorial office may forward the requests to the Publishers or Editor-in-Chief, who will take the decision directly.

As a reward for the work of editors, an editor will obtain a 25% discount of the standard publication fee for her/his papers (the editor is one of authors) published in any of RonPub journals.

Guest Editors’ Responsibilities

Guest Editors are responsible of the scientific quality of their special issues. Guest Editors will be in charge of inviting papers, of supervising the refereeing process (each paper should be reviewed at least by three reviewers), and of making decisions on the acceptance of manuscripts submitted to their special issue. As regular issues, all accepted papers by (guest) editors will be sent to the EiC of the journal, who will check the quality of the papers, and make the final decsion whether a paper can be published.

Our editorial office will have the right directly asking authors to revise their paper if there are quality issues, e.g. weak quality of writing, and missing information. Authors are required to revise their paper several times if necessary. A paper accepted by it's quest editor may be rejected by the EiC of the journal due to a low quality. However, this occurs only when authors do not really take efforts to revise their paper. A high-quality publication needs the common efforts from the journal, reviewers, editors, editor-in-chief and authors.

The Guest Editors are also expected to write an editorial paper for the special issue. As a reward for work, all guest editors and reviewers working on a special issue will obtain a 25% discount of the standard publication fee for any of their papers published in any of RonPub journals for one year.

Reviewers’ Responsiblity

A reviewer is mainly responsible for reviewing of manuscripts, writing reviewing report and suggesting acception or deny of manuscripts. Reviews are encouraged to provide input about the quality and management of the journal, and help promote the journal among their peers and at conferences.  

Upon the quality of reviewing work, a reviewer will have the potential to be promoted to a full editorial board member. 

As a reward for the reviewing work, a reviewer will obtain a 25% discount of the standard publication fee for her/his papers (the review is one of authors) published in any of RonPub journals.

Launching New Journals

RonPub always welcomes suggestions for new open access journals in any research area. We are also open for publishing collaborations with research societies. Please send your proposals for new journals or for publishing collaboration to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Publication Criteria

This part provides important information for both the scientific committees and authors.

Ethic Requirement:

For scientific committees: Each editor and reviewer should conduct the evaluation of manuscripts objectively and fairly.
For authors: Authors should present their work honestly without fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or inappropriate data manipulation.

Pre-Check:

In order to filter fabricated submissions, the editorial office will check the authenticity of the authors and their affiliations before a peer-review begins. It is important that the authors communicate with us using the email addresses of their affiliations and provide us the URL addresses of their affiliations. To verify the originality of submissions, we use various plagiarism detection tools to check the content of manuscripts submitted to our journal against existing publications. The overall quality of paper will be also checked including format, figures, tables, integrity and adequacy. Authors may be required to improve the quality of their paper before sending it out for review. If a paper is obviously of low quality, the paper will be directly rejected.

Acceptance Criteria:

The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts are the quality of work. This will concretely be reflected in the following aspects:

  • Novelty and Practical Impact
  • Technical Soundness
  • Appropriateness and Adequacy of 
    • Literature Review
    • Background Discussion
    • Analysis of Issues
  • Presentation, including 
    • Overall Organization 
    • English 
    • Readability

For a contribution to be acceptable for publication, these points should be at least in middle level.

Guidelines for Rejection:

  • If the work described in the manuscript has been published, or is under consideration for publication anywhere else, it will not be evaluated.
  • If the work is a plagiarism, or contains data falsification or fabrication, it will be rejected.
  • Manuscripts, which have seriously technical flaws, will not be accepted.

Call for Journals

Research Online Publishing (RonPub, www.ronpub.com) is a publisher of online, open access and peer-reviewed scientific journals.  For more information about RonPub please visit this link.

RonPub always welcomes suggestions for new journals in any research area. Please send your proposals for journals along with your Curriculum Vitae to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

We are also open for publishing collaborations with research societies. Please send your publishing collaboration also to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Be an Editor / Be a Reviewer

RonPub always welcomes qualified academicians and practitioners to join as editors and reviewers. Being an editor/a reviewer is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. Upon the quality of reviewing work, a reviewer will have the potential to be promoted to a full editorial board member.

If you would like to participate as a scientific committee member of any of RonPub journals, please send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with your curriculum vitae. We will revert back as soon as possible. For more information about editors/reviewers, please visit this link.

Contact RonPub

Location

RonPub UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Hiddenseering 30
23560 Lübeck
Germany

Comments and Questions

For general inquiries, please e-mail to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

For specific questions on a certain journal, please visit the corresponding journal page to see the email address.